Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palagummi Harish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 15:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Palagummi Harish

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO due to the lack of substantial coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Promotional. Rentier (talk) 23:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable VC guy. Does not have significant RS coverage sufficient to meet WP:GNG, and just being connected to notable historical figures isn't enough since notability is not inherited.PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Incubate Following the review of resources currently out there, and the potential of innovation, this page seemed quite apt to develop. Yes the citations of the Australian and Financial Review seemed promotional, but it felt that there was something more there, and considering the nature of his background and the work being conducted it is ground breaking. Incubating the page for longer will allow for it to reach its maturity potential, otherwise I would not have developed it in the first place. Altoanakritis (talk) 09:11, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – No significant coverage on the subject itself except that relating him to V. V. Giri, and notability is not inherited. Seems like promotion. Kb.au (talk) 06:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Judging by the approach taken to WP:BLP incubation processes, it looks like the additional scrutiny, profiling and racial bias is quite apparent. I now suggest that this page is best deleted so that Wikipedia can continue its portrayal of the future records in a way it deems necessary. Altoanakritis (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotional article about someone of insufficient encyclopedic notability. SunChaser (talk) 01:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet the criteria at WP:BIO. Brad v 22:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.